-need to add description-
-need to add description-
Can you please post a screenshot/mockup with several tabs + splitscreen + tree view for both the bright and the dark version?
I'd like to know how it looks like with your new design as the tabs are now above the bread crumbs.
I like it overall very much, though. However, I woudln't mind either, if the separators were removed. :)
Would the file dialog inherit the new style as well?
I'm asking because the navigator positioning/spacing/width is depending how many icons users put in the toolbar to the left of it, right? So eventually it could happen that on the left hand side you'd end up with a very small navigator which is barely readable, while the right hand one looks perfectly fine.
Hmm, yeah, I see what you mean... Maybe fixing the same size to both and not centering it to the view itself but to the toolbar might work when there are many icons. Does anyone know any other solution to this?
I'm thinking maybe the breadcrumb shouldn't go in the toolbar. If you have to make all toolbuttons icons only to get the breadcrumb to fit, it's not good. There is real usability research that shows how labels are important for buttons with non-standard icons: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/icon-usability/
Yeah, the breadcrumbs shouldn't be squashed to fit, nor the icons.
Maybe making the current breadcrumbs part in dolphin be a regular toolbar part that you can add, remove or move to other toolbars might be another option, while also keeping good defaults. Should we talk about this here or T11663?
Just some ideas I'd also love to see implemented:
I tried this behavior in Firefox for a while but grew to hate it. I would always hit the Alt key for some other reason than then be mildly annoyed that the menubar showed up, pusing everything else in the window down. And it would disappear again based on an indeterminate condition. I think if we want to commit to hiding the menubar by default and showing a hamburger menu instead, we need to commit to it. No half-measures. :)
@elvisangelaccio, how do you feel about this? I'd like to avoid letting the conversation go in directions you won't be okay with, since you're the maintainer.
Principally, we seem to be a bit stuck on where to put the breadcrumbs bar/URL navigator. Many people prefer it in the toolbar (splitting in half when the split view feature is in use), but some prefer it right where it is inside the view. Maybe you can offer your viewpoint?
Does everything else look okay?
It seems to me that moving the url navigator to the toolbar creates more problems than it solves, because of split views.
What for? Just to be similar to other filemanagers? How many of them have split views anyway?
I think there were a few ideas behind moving it to the toolbar:
Of course the drawbacks of this are:
Ultimately I think it's your call here.
I've been thinking the same thing. I think if we commit to putting it in the toolbar, we'll have to make the usability worse. It's more detached from the parts of the UI it actually affects. It needs a lot of dedicated space, so we'll end up needing to use more icon-only buttons.
I agree with this. I also think we should integrate the search button with the breadcrumb rather than having it sit in the toolbar, completely detached from the part of the UI it affects.
I wanted to add one more thing (in addition to my comments above). Not everyone wants more room for the path bar. The breadcrumb bar as pictured above, IMO, is perfect for my needs personally. I also have to wonder how many people are using the unique features of split panel vs actually just using it as a way to navigate to another folder. Many don't seem to realize that Dolphin has a folder view (push F7).
Thanks, that looks nice.
These mockups appear to have removed the Sort By menu button that's currently in the toolbar next to the view choosers. Is that intentional? I feel like that's useful (especially in the default icon view) and I'd like to keep it.
I agree, quite nice.
I wonder if we should make the status bar span the entire bottom of the window, not just the view area. And maybe we should keep it with a gray background. That way there would be two gray bars at the top and bottom of the window anchoring everything in the middle.
What do you think?
I think the status bar is better off being how it is in the current version. It has controls and info that are directly related to the view area and I think it's appropriate that the status bar is duplicated for split views. It should keep using the Window Backround color too, since it is not part of the view area with selectable items.
I think we should, but I'd wait at least a day for a response from others.
I know @kderich suggested providing an option for this and a lot of people were excited about this. We should be extra careful about adding options that are mainly just cosmetic though. Especially ones like this one that have negative aspects.
I have a feeling this topic is going to come back every once in a while until the feature is implemented.
I do not share the concern that the toolbar will be too crowded when the path is added. Looking at the mockups I feel like there is enough space left even if we keep the current labels as they are. The path becomes a relative one anyways when there isn't enough space which isn't terrible. When this change was discussed in the VDG chat half a year ago there was a consensus that it looked better and I am pretty sure users will be happy with this change as well.
The only concern I share is how to handle split view. I don't use split view but I can see how not being able to directly manipulate the paths of both views might be inconvenient. Falling back to the current behaviour is also always an option if split view users love it the way it is now.
So I hope we can decide on putting the path into the toolbar. If we can't do that I would hope we can decide on having the option to do so.
Sorry, we can't make this an option. Moving the navigator to the toolbar would require lots of changes to the code. We can't possibly maintain both implementations, it would be a nightmare.
I vote yes.
TBH I vote no. It won't look cramped by default in single-pane mode IMHO and if it's hard to maintain both implementations then we should just keep to the toolbar idea and, for space-saving on split view, here's an idea:
The pathbars can have two states in Split View: Normal when they appear as they normally do and Contracted where they just show their current folder.
The active pane's pathbar will automatically be Normal, while the inactive pane's pathbar will be Contracted (obviously the positions of these will reflect the locations of the panes (left-pane has the left-side pathbar, right-pane has the right-side pathbar))
When hovering over the Contracted one, it'll become Normal while the other becomes Contracted
When no longer hovering over that now Normal pathbar the process will reverse (unless you're editing the folder path in which case it'll only happen once the path is no longer being edited), making the active pathbar Normal and the inactive pathbar Contracted again
To make it less visually jarring, maybe have an animation of the pathbar expanding and pushing the other one into a Contracted state.
It seems they have put the breadcrumb into Dolphin's toolbar. I don't have the time currently, but you may check it out and have a more detailed look at how it performs overall, also considering the splitview.
I'd say no. I prefer how the toolbar looks like no space is wasted with the URL in it. It makes me feel like my screen space is being more respected than the other. That's just my thought on it, anyway.