- User Since
- Apr 18 2015, 11:52 AM (266 w, 5 d)
Hi @staniek . While I am currently doing some work to keep api.kde.org alive and cleaning up legacy docs where possible, I remembered this task and would be available to complete it these days :)
Tue, May 26
Mon, May 25
Looking at D28915, seems you are only collecting to earn push rights so far :), so going to push for you with the author info taken from there.
@meven Have you already got in contact with the other users/maintainers of he thumnbail cache spec about the idea to extend it with support for high dpi? If not, please consider to do so, so things will also work cross-toolkit/platforms in the future there, by being based on an agreed & formalized specification. Not being involved here or having full understanding of the topic, but I would guess your approach with the separate x2 should run into "make sense" responses, so the additional effort might be low for the gain of being based on an official spec.
Sun, May 24
As I am not sure about the risk introduced by the just-works-currently alignment in the union, I would rather discard this patch for now. Going from union to having both fields increases the runtime for what I measured, despite the reserve(), so also not eager to add that just for some syntactic sugar.
Happy to have somebody else pick this up though, just not continuing myself.
Rebased/Updated as https://invent.kde.org/plasma/libksysguard/-/merge_requests/10
@junghans Hi. Do you have push rights, or do you need someone to merge your patch?
Sat, May 23
Fri, May 22
Thu, May 21
Wed, May 20
Tue, May 19
Patch worked fine also on real server run the last two nights. So going to push later today once at my respective development setup. Will push as is, given safe_load() is now also used without any conditions for the new invent.kde.org git helper :) so doing as the real Python developers do.