- User Since
- Apr 18 2015, 11:52 AM (231 w, 1 d)
Fri, Sep 20
Other than that, the source code is Free Software under GPL/LGPL, so anyone is free to do with it what they want as long as they comply with the license ;)
Thanks for asking.
I am not aware of anyone who would support Okteta on Windows. I would not, as I joined KDE once to work on and support FLOSS , not to spend free time and add value to proprietary systems, especially those violating privacy principles these days additionally.
I am more and more wondering whether I still fit here.
Thu, Sep 19
Wed, Sep 18
+update to only add Qt5Core check
If found no other usage/documenation of BUILD_SHARED_LIBS, so I concluded this is some left-over from older (more promising) times?
Sounds like there should be some additional "Generic icon" entry in the app/desktopfile metadata, so people can decide whether they want to see brand-based icons or function-based icons, like there is with "Name" & "Generic Name".
Mon, Sep 16
Sun, Sep 15
Sat, Sep 14
The current macro does not check for the existence, so the dep is hard IMHO.
PS: That''s also the reason why I gave up on porting kdelibs4support away from it, given the tool is leaked in the public interface by this macro (cmp. comment D22776#503175)
It's there because one of the cmake macros kdelibs4support installs depends on its existance, see
Currently still busy trying to get unit tests done, half-way through that. ETA begin of upcoming week.
Next plan: see how only having the 3-arg-FOO_DEPRECATED_VERSION(major. minor, message) would work by using that in the experimental patches done for some KF repos.
Thu, Sep 12
Wed, Sep 11
- reword documentation based on dfaure's comments
- bump since-version to 5.64.0, as currently targetted introduction version
@dfaure Thanks for first in-detail feedback, good to get a feeling this is not totally insane over-engineered stuff to other people'e eyes :)
Tue, Sep 10
Thanks for review :)