Create Task
Maniphest T15976

Add bugs.kde.org entry for KTextTemplate
Closed, ResolvedPublic
Actions

Description

While there is a product entry for Grantlee, I'd think we would simply add a new, given KTextTemplate is to some degree a fork and might have issues of its own, also will it make finding the product easier.

To match the pattern of existing entries for KF modules, I'd think the name should be

frameworks-ktexttemplate

Compare also https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi

Description would be copied from https://invent.kde.org/sysadmin/repo-metadata/-/blob/master/projects-invent/libraries/ktexttemplate/metadata.yaml#L1:

Library to allow application developers to separate the structure of documents from the data they contain.

Any proposals who should be default assginee? kxmlgui has kdelibs bugs, for some community-like email address. Perhaps there should be some kf-bugs instead, to match the KF product name?

Related Objects

kossebau added a comment.Nov 17 2022, 4:17 PM

If no-one has objections or has other ideas, would then go upcoming WE Nov 19/20 and create such product "frameworks-ktexttemplate", with the usual "general" component, using kdelibs-bugs as default assignee for the start.
IIRC I still have respective bko karma to execute such creation myself, so no other help needed :)

dfaure added a comment.Nov 17 2022, 6:00 PM

The name seems wrong to me, it's not part of KF5. Why not just call it "ktexttemplate" like the repo?

dfaure added a comment.Nov 17 2022, 6:01 PM

projects-invent/libraries/ktexttemplate/metadata.yaml says

projectpath: playground/libs/ktexttemplate
repopath: libraries/ktexttemplate
kossebau added a comment.Nov 17 2022, 6:05 PM

The name seems wrong to me, it's not part of KF5.

It is not part of KF5, but scheduled to be part of KF6. See also https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/2022-February/091573.html

And the move to libraries was mainly done to get Qt6 CI working, not because it should be released as stand-alone.

kossebau added a comment.Nov 17 2022, 6:06 PM

@dfaure But meh, I would have though you are in that loop :) Seems people missed to communicate as needed?

dfaure added a comment.Nov 17 2022, 6:14 PM

Oh, OK, the name will be right at some point, so, sure, call it that way.

I think I read that email and forgot since.
But yeah I'm more and more out of the loop anyway, being less and less active.

kossebau added a comment.Nov 17 2022, 6:22 PM
In T15976#283926, @dfaure wrote:

Oh, OK, the name will be right at some point, so, sure, call it that way.

Okay, good.

I think I read that email and forgot since.

Myself am especially aware as I 3 years ago wasted lots of time into reacting on an earlier proposal to move Grantlle to KF ;) Ssee all the dead work linked from T14887 (which I partially still have to redo now for the new variant of the lib... oh, humans...)