- User Since
- Apr 15 2015, 7:39 AM (179 w, 5 d)
I'm not really enthusiastic about it -- it presupposes that the only goal of pasting is to transform the paste and merge it with the current layer. If we implement this, users would have to create a new layer and then do the paste and then cancel the transformation if the goal of pasting is to create a new layer.
Sat, Sep 22
I'm not sure what you're trying to do here, but this diff basically is one of my recent commits...
Thu, Sep 20
I'm all for this thing -- please don't think we're ignoring you . I'm just really preoccupied with the fund raiser, so it'll be some time before I can look at it.
Wed, Sep 19
Tue, Sep 18
Only stands, or the roll-ups themselves? In any case, maybe we should get new ones designed and printed in any case? I wanted to have one that would advertise the community, and one that would advertise the variety of applications we have.
I've contacted Jens about design for the roll-ups.
Mon, Sep 17
In Krita we often mention the bug number in the commit message title, though more often as BUG:XXXXX.
No, the more I think about it, the more this seems wrong to me. It's not the way things have ever worked, nor does it work like this in other applications.
Shubham: I don't know of any guidelines like that...
Sat, Sep 15
I'm not sure this a good idea: this breaks one's workflow if you want to set up a new group and add a layer to that empty group.
I'm okay with this patch, but please wait with landing it until we've released 4.1.2 so we don't have to cherry-pick patches to the krita/4.1 branch anymore.