I think we should wait a bit with formally deprecating. I like add the new, wait a bit, then deprecate.

Also, while I might be a unconventional developer, but given this is a tier 1 library, I'm often hand patching the required ECM version to a much lower version to test stuff when I know it will work. So I'd say. Yes. nice patch, but let's wait a month or two with submitting it.

In D29747#671169, @svuorela wrote:

I think we should wait a bit with formally deprecating. I like add the new, wait a bit, then deprecate.

So you propose to also remove the @deprecated from the API dox?

And wait, for what to happen?

In D29747#671169, @svuorela wrote:

I think we should wait a bit with formally deprecating. I like add the new, wait a bit, then deprecate.

@deprecated since 5.69 Prefer preferredSize() or trueMinimumSize(). is no formal deprecation? It would be for me though, thus I am puzzled why the reader of the API dox & the compiler are differently instructed here currently. Could you elaborate? :)

PIM has been fully adapted meanwhile, only https://phabricator.kde.org/D29478 missing I think.

Ping... :)

Okay :) Hm, need to update 71 to 72 though first, doing now.