It will make possible for applets to know they are in a systray-like
situation
BUG:388995
Details
Details
- Reviewers
- None
- Group Reviewers
Plasma
it will need the systray to actually make use of this
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- R242 Plasma Framework (Library)
- Branch
- master
- Lint
No Linters Available - Unit
No Unit Test Coverage
Comment Actions
Commit message could see some "bug:388995" :)
"ConstrainedSquare" sounds like there could be other "Constrained*" in the future? Why this term combination instead of just "Square"?
Comment Actions
suggests that is more about it being constrained both horizontally and vertically than being a square, which may not be a given (the actual name comes from an old enum value in Plasma 4 that was AspectRatio)
is i think the most correct name, even if less intuitive would be just "constrained"
| src/plasma/plasma.h | ||
|---|---|---|
| 89 | Lacks < on the comment. | |
Comment Actions
If so, let's change it to "Constrained" then, if there is a chance that the ratio can be different from 1:1.
Though, what about "Bounded" instead? Non-native speaker myself, but possibly sounds more close to real-estate boundaries also for others and might be more intuitive than the more abstract "constrained", which could refer to any kind of constraints. Also is the term used elsewhere in Qt API, also for the same purpose of describing limits.
Any plans to have fullscreen applets one day? There it would also be some vertically & horizontally constrained formfactor, would/should this new formfactor type also be used for such, or would there then be similar variants like there is for "Planar" with "Application" and "MediaCenter"?