I would prevent MIT license for the highlighting - and also for the test.

Oh, and see this: https://github.com/KDE/syntax-highlighting/pull/5

In D5338#100509, @dhaumann wrote:

Oh, and see this: https://github.com/KDE/syntax-highlighting/pull/5

What the... Created at almost the exact same time? :)

In D5338#100575, @kfunk wrote:

In D5338#100509, @dhaumann wrote:

Oh, and see this: https://github.com/KDE/syntax-highlighting/pull/5

What the... Created at almost the exact same time? :)

Hello guys, I was using my version for a long time and just Apr7 decided to commit,
and raised a pull request on Github.
and what I see - a couple hours earlier the same config was commited here :)

you see my version has a few minor enhancements, primary of these is a defining valid keywords.
I'm newbie here, need a some time to understand how to use the instruments.
after that, I'll suggest my additions to current version , if you do not mind

In D5338#101466, @emaurer wrote:

In D5338#100575, @kfunk wrote:

In D5338#100509, @dhaumann wrote:

Oh, and see this: https://github.com/KDE/syntax-highlighting/pull/5

What the... Created at almost the exact same time? :)

Hello guys, I was using my version for a long time and just Apr7 decided to commit,
and raised a pull request on Github.
and what I see - a couple hours earlier the same config was commited here :)

you see my version has a few minor enhancements, primary of these is a defining valid keywords.
I'm newbie here, need a some time to understand how to use the instruments.
after that, I'll suggest my additions to current version , if you do not mind

Heya,

indeed, I saw that you had a set of valid keywords. If you're okay with it I'll just pull them in myself & then push this patch. We can work together on adding more stuff to it later on, no problem.

Heya,

indeed, I saw that you had a set of valid keywords. If you're okay with it I'll just pull them in myself & then push this patch. We can work together on adding more stuff to it later on, no problem.

sure, feel free to use from mine for a pushing

seems the key diferences are

1. highlight a auto-generated comments between secions to see these during quick scrolling (comments like fullline #--------------------------------- (asked me by other man from this community)
2. highlight varibles from build systems : with prefix @
3. valid for doxy config keywords

my 2 cents:

I've used the syntax made by Ernst quite a long time and pretty happy w/ it :)

@emaurer We just agreed that your version is better and would like to use this. Are you also OK with using the MIT license? Currently, we are trying to unify the licensing to MIT for as many of our xml highlighting files as possible.

In D5338#128106, @dhaumann wrote:

@emaurer We just agreed that your version is better and would like to use this. Are you also OK with using the MIT license? Currently, we are trying to unify the licensing to MIT for as many of our xml highlighting files as possible.

yes, confirmed, you can use the code with MIT license.