I like packages stating their dependencies (even runtime ones) because that's where I look first as a packager. But if I'm not missing something (maybe a git add?) this change is a bit misleading because they can never be found. So I think two Find... modules are also needed or "message..." should stay.

In D2377#44484, @heikobecker wrote:

So I think two Find... modules are also needed or "message..." should stay.

Well. No.

https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/command/find_package.html

Every non-REQUIRED find_package call can be disabled by setting the CMAKE_DISABLE_FIND_PACKAGE_<PackageName> variable to TRUE.

In D2377#44495, @sitter wrote:

In D2377#44484, @heikobecker wrote:

So I think two Find... modules are also needed or "message..." should stay.

Well. No.

https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/command/find_package.html

Every non-REQUIRED find_package call can be disabled by setting the CMAKE_DISABLE_FIND_PACKAGE_<PackageName> variable to TRUE.

Well, I understand that but I *really* don't think a message should be shown, that always yields the same result, no matter if it can be disabled via CMAKE_D_F_P_Foo or the packages in question are installed or not. What's the difference to message in that case?
Also imagine a user investigating why the two packages don't show up although he has installed them.

In D2377#44513, @heikobecker wrote:

Also imagine a user investigating why the two packages don't show up although he has installed them.

In the landing version I have added notes about them not being detected automatically and how to ignore them. That said, if you want to write a reliable font finder that would be pretty cool.