User Details
- User Since
- Apr 18 2015, 1:59 PM (200 w, 3 d)
- Availability
- Available
Yesterday
Very good, by chance, where are the artifacts for kexi builds?
Sun, Feb 17
Tue, Feb 12
Tue, Feb 5
Thanks a lot @apol, it looks promising and clean. I have questions based on my limited knowledge of these json files:
- kreport, kproperty, kdb modules - can their branch be 3.2 too? They're BC but still using stable dependencies for stable builds would be better
- the top level "branch" attribute is master, not sure what it means
- what would be the URL at https://binary-factory.kde.org/ for the stable?
Fri, Feb 1
Right, for master and stable (currently "3.2").
Wed, Jan 30
@apol Thanks, adding another nightly for other branch was my initial though. Can we add this? We would be done then.
Thanks Ben, it's hard to argue with this standard behavior. I am wondering though how to trigger the build in projects like KEXI - there can be weeks of development when changes are in kdb.git only and not in kexi.git. More precisely, how to deal with that without adding artificial commits to kexi.git.
Landed, now how to rebuild it? Can I get rights to click Rebuild?
I may want this in other cases, e.g. when kexi.git is unchanges but when dependencies changed and we want to test things while testers are waiting for binaries. For nightly builds it means one test per 24h I'd assume?
Yes, Ben summarized what I meant. Thanks. We're not yet there (that is, production-ready flatpack or app store of any kind, with QA and regular contributors). We can't have all of this the day one, we need nighties so would-be contributors who are not developers have the chances to test current software (stable/unstable). Current state is that many contributors (power users) run 1 or 2 years old software so even initial conversation within bugs.kde.org is problematic.
Tue, Jan 29
Sun, Jan 27
Thanks Aleix. I'd like to understand: you are not planning it but do you see some rejection by principle or by technical reason?
Bottom line is that for Windows there is no such split and stable software "by KDE" has chance to be shipped.
Thu, Jan 24
Wed, Jan 23
Tue, Jan 22
@apol Hi Aleix, is there any support for stable builds?
Mon, Jan 21
Thanks for the hint.
Jan 15 2019
@piggz
Pushed for 3.2 Beta, post-commit review would be welcome.
Planned for 3.2.0 after Beta.
@piggz
Pushed for 3.2 Beta, post-commit review would be welcome.