In case I install the patch, weboob is disabled apparently because I am missing a few things here on my system. So all I can say is that KMyMoney compiles and work in case the prerequisites for weboob are not met.

In D9855#190379, @tbaumgart wrote:

In case I install the patch, weboob is disabled apparently because I am missing a few things here on my system. So all I can say is that KMyMoney compiles and work in case the prerequisites for weboob are not met.

Could you check whether you're missing python dependency or weboob?
In case of weboob it's very easy when you follow user installation from git by following command

./tools/local_install.sh ~/.local/bin

In D9855#202891, @pino wrote:

Considering Python2 has been on maintainance mode for a number of years already, and it will be EOL in 2020 (see https://pythonclock.org/), then please use Python3 directly (or at least allow to use both Python2 and Python3).

I have a feeling you didn't compile the code, so you don't know what you're talking about. Please apply your advices, try to compile and return with new look :)

In D9855#203058, @wojnilowicz wrote:

In D9855#202891, @pino wrote:

Considering Python2 has been on maintainance mode for a number of years already, and it will be EOL in 2020 (see https://pythonclock.org/), then please use Python3 directly (or at least allow to use both Python2 and Python3).

I have a feeling you didn't compile the code, so you don't know what you're talking about.

Looking at the patch was enough to say that your code requires Python2 and actively rejects Python3; building confirms that:

-- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python3.6 (found suitable version "3.6.4", minimum required is "2.6") 
-- Found PythonLibs: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython3.6m.so (found suitable version "3.6.4", minimum required is "3.6.4") 
CMake Warning at CMakeLists.txt:192 (message):
  Python 2 required, but Python 3 found.

[...]
weboob plugin:                           no

The rest of my notes still applies.

Please apply your advices, try to compile and return with new look :)

Just a note about this (it will be my only one): since we never interacted before, nor we know each other, this kind of sentence is not exactly polite (it goes on the borderline of rudeness). I assume that this was surely not your intention, so my suggestion is to not use such approach with newcomers (or people you did not interact already).

In D9855#203231, @pino wrote:

In D9855#203058, @wojnilowicz wrote:

In D9855#202891, @pino wrote:

Considering Python2 has been on maintainance mode for a number of years already, and it will be EOL in 2020 (see https://pythonclock.org/), then please use Python3 directly (or at least allow to use both Python2 and Python3).

I have a feeling you didn't compile the code, so you don't know what you're talking about.

Looking at the patch was enough to say that your code requires Python2 and actively rejects Python3; building confirms that:

Why would I need Python 3 if I need Python 2 explicitly? Python 3 is completely useless in my case. I don't understand your point.

The rest of my notes still applies.

Alkimia is needed (otherwise failed compilation), hack is needed. Encoding will be fixed.

Please apply your advices, try to compile and return with new look :)

Just a note about this (it will be my only one): since we never interacted before, nor we know each other, this kind of sentence is not exactly polite (it goes on the borderline of rudeness). I assume that this was surely not your intention, so my suggestion is to not use such approach with newcomers (or people you did not interact already).

Sorry if you felt offended. It's true, that it was not my intention. English is not my native language. As you could see I tried to write polite sentence. I don't know what I can do about it.

In D9855#203541, @wojnilowicz wrote:

In D9855#203231, @pino wrote:

In D9855#203058, @wojnilowicz wrote:

In D9855#202891, @pino wrote:

Considering Python2 has been on maintainance mode for a number of years already, and it will be EOL in 2020 (see https://pythonclock.org/), then please use Python3 directly (or at least allow to use both Python2 and Python3).

I have a feeling you didn't compile the code, so you don't know what you're talking about.

Looking at the patch was enough to say that your code requires Python2 and actively rejects Python3; building confirms that:

Why would I need Python 3 if I need Python 2 explicitly? Python 3 is completely useless in my case. I don't understand your point.

This is exactly what I mentioned in my initial comment:Python 2 will be dead soon, in approximately 2 years. As consequence, introducing right now Python code that does not work with Python 3 is not a good idea, as requires already the need for porting, in case it is not a temporary sort-term solution.
Almost all the upstreams of Python projects already ported to Python 3 their code, and Linux (and not only) distributions are already looking into switching to Python 3 as default (some already did, like Archlinux and Fedora), and possibly to not even install Python 2 in base/desktop installations.

I hope this explains why it is really important to not have Python 2-only code around.

The rest of my notes still applies.

Alkimia is needed (otherwise failed compilation), hack is needed. Encoding will be fixed.

I do not see any Alkimia class used in the weboob plugin. Can you please specify which issues do you get?

Please apply your advices, try to compile and return with new look :)

Just a note about this (it will be my only one): since we never interacted before, nor we know each other, this kind of sentence is not exactly polite (it goes on the borderline of rudeness). I assume that this was surely not your intention, so my suggestion is to not use such approach with newcomers (or people you did not interact already).

Sorry if you felt offended. It's true, that it was not my intention. English is not my native language. As you could see I tried to write polite sentence. I don't know what I can do about it.

English is not my native language either. OTOH your tone was, and still is, passive-aggressive.

In D9855#206600, @pino wrote:

In D9855#203541, @wojnilowicz wrote:

In D9855#203231, @pino wrote:

In D9855#203058, @wojnilowicz wrote:

In D9855#202891, @pino wrote:

Considering Python2 has been on maintainance mode for a number of years already, and it will be EOL in 2020 (see https://pythonclock.org/), then please use Python3 directly (or at least allow to use both Python2 and Python3).

I have a feeling you didn't compile the code, so you don't know what you're talking about.

Looking at the patch was enough to say that your code requires Python2 and actively rejects Python3; building confirms that:

Why would I need Python 3 if I need Python 2 explicitly? Python 3 is completely useless in my case. I don't understand your point.

This is exactly what I mentioned in my initial comment:Python 2 will be dead soon, in approximately 2 years. As consequence, introducing right now Python code that does not work with Python 3 is not a good idea, as requires already the need for porting, in case it is not a temporary sort-term solution.
Almost all the upstreams of Python projects already ported to Python 3 their code, and Linux (and not only) distributions are already looking into switching to Python 3 as default (some already did, like Archlinux and Fedora), and possibly to not even install Python 2 in base/desktop installations.

I hope this explains why it is really important to not have Python 2-only code around.

I agree that Python 2 is not a good idea, but I think there are some points you're missing:

1. 2 years is still very long term,
2. Fedora still uses Python 2 as the default one,
3. Weboob depends on Python 2 and it's not the utility that I maintain.

The rest of my notes still applies.

Alkimia is needed (otherwise failed compilation), hack is needed. Encoding will be fixed.

I do not see any Alkimia class used in the weboob plugin. Can you please specify which issues do you get?

You don't see it and I don't see it too, but did you actually compiled it? I assume not. I compiled it and it screams for alkimia in some dependent header.
It may be that alkimia is faulty.

Please apply your advices, try to compile and return with new look :)

Just a note about this (it will be my only one): since we never interacted before, nor we know each other, this kind of sentence is not exactly polite (it goes on the borderline of rudeness). I assume that this was surely not your intention, so my suggestion is to not use such approach with newcomers (or people you did not interact already).

Sorry if you felt offended. It's true, that it was not my intention. English is not my native language. As you could see I tried to write polite sentence. I don't know what I can do about it.

English is not my native language either. OTOH your tone was, and still is, passive-aggressive.

Maybe that's only your feeling. I think it's not the right place to discuss such topics here.