Ooops, I must have overlooked that simple NOT which makes a difference: "NOT (5.42 < 5.38)" is equal to "(5.42 >= 5.38)". So it is executed and necessary. Forget what I wrote.

Initial information about the last released source code file added to the master branch in https://invent.kde.org/office/kmymoney/commit/f0008d9c24f69adf8cf8c9a239be30b729b1ccf2

I added it as a subtask to https://invent.kde.org/office/kmymoney/-/issues/8 so we will have it in the upcoming release

I agree with @wrobelda at this point. The website should reflect the work of the development team.

I am all for automation when it is documented or self-explanatory. The structure sounds like a good idea as it is extendable.

@atem Don't worry to much about the enclosing HTML. As I mentioned, that was the q&d way to get the jekyll supported version going. It's the content that should be kept. We don't care if it comes out of a config file (preferred) or not. I agree, it is easier to maintain. Regarding the versions: we have a latest based on KF5 (stable) and one on KDE4 (vintage is a cool name). The versions available for download maybe different, depending on the OS environment. Here is how we displayed different versions in the old days of the project (Example).

@atem in case you need to adjust the HTML and want to convert it to markdown, please feel free to make suggestions. This seems to be a leftover from the conversion to jekyll.

I'll take care of landing it but this may only happen after the repository has been moved to its new location over the weekend.

Simply add it here.

I wondered who added the #if 0 / #endif and traced them back into 2009 but could not go back any further. They existed every since.
It certainly does not make sense to skip adding a method and then later on make it the current one (2nd last line of this method). That is simply wrong. So the fix to add those methods seems valid to me.

Yes, will do. Just did not find the time to do it.

I see, you get a kick out of this charting stuff. Cool.

Merci beaucoup. Looks good to me.

Still looks OK to me. Push it.

Do we have a bug entry for this one? If not, please create one and add

Looks good to me.

This in general is a high quality patch. Thanks much. The changes I suggest are minor details.