Use QFormLayout in the KompareUrlDialog
Changes PlannedPublic

Authored by ognarb on Apr 20 2020, 5:06 PM.

Details

Reviewers
kossebau
ngraham
Group Reviewers
VDG
Test Plan

Before:


After:

Diff Detail

Repository
R454 Kompare
Branch
formlayout
Lint
No Linters Available
Unit
No Unit Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 25544
Build 25562: arc lint + arc unit
ognarb requested review of this revision.Apr 20 2020, 5:06 PM
ognarb created this revision.
ognarb updated this revision to Diff 80676.Apr 20 2020, 6:06 PM

Fix small bug

ognarb retitled this revision from Use form layout for dialog to Use QFormLayout in the KompareUrlDialog.Apr 20 2020, 6:09 PM
ognarb edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)
ognarb added a reviewer: VDG.
ognarb updated this revision to Diff 80680.Apr 20 2020, 6:12 PM

Fix wrong string

ognarb updated this revision to Diff 80681.Apr 20 2020, 6:12 PM

Remove unused code

ognarb edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)Apr 20 2020, 6:19 PM
ngraham accepted this revision.Apr 20 2020, 6:25 PM
ngraham added a subscriber: ngraham.

LGTM!

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Apr 20 2020, 6:25 PM

As now and then Kompare user not sure I woudl fancy having less wide input fields for destination & source. I often operate in deep folder levels, the more of the path to see, the better (your example screenshots also already show this). And looking at the After screenshot, it really seems strange that all the screen real estate is not used, instead things are squashed at the top.
Surely the old design was also not that fancy. But it seems more usable to me :) So if you ask me, not to happy about this change.

And then some nitpick comments:
*KDE HIG wants ":" after labels consistently

ognarb planned changes to this revision.Apr 20 2020, 8:51 PM

As now and then Kompare user not sure I woudl fancy having less wide input fields for destination & source. I often operate in deep folder levels, the more of the path to see, the better (your example screenshots also already show this). And looking at the After screenshot, it really seems strange that all the screen real estate is not used, instead things are squashed at the top.

The after screenshot is also a bit smaller but I see that you mean. I'm not sure how to fix it.

Surely the old design was also not that fancy. But it seems more usable to me :) So if you ask me, not to happy about this change.

And then some nitpick comments:
*KDE HIG wants ":" after labels consistently

Thanks I will fix those