Does this hide the existing "Click on a Bit to toggle it." tooltip?

I guess it does, how do you feel about it?

Yes, the "Click on a Bit to toggle it." tooltip only shows when the cursor is not over a bit.
If you want to set the bit 19, for example, it's annoying to have to count the bits to know exactly which is the correct one.

Christoph, what do you think?

Would could use a tooltip that shows both:

Bit %d\n
(Click to toggle)

I don't like the idea to show too much information each time the mouse is over a bit button.

Showing the same information over and over again doesn't help and can quickly become annoying.

How about changing the cursor shape to PointingHandCursor while the mouse is over a bit button?
I'm not sure what the best practices are when using cursor shapes.

In D20615#453111, @athurh wrote:

I don't like the idea to show too much information each time the mouse is over a bit button.

Showing the same information over and over again doesn't help and can quickly become annoying.

How about changing the cursor shape to PointingHandCursor while the mouse is over a bit button?

We don't do that for regular buttons so doesn't seem the best of the ideas to me.

What maybe makes sense is "half-paint" them on mouse over?

The on hover looks really great.

Do you think we should also paint in "on hover" even if it's set when the mouse is over it? I'm conflicted

Oh, i tried to land the code but the automatic checker complained about your full name being "athurh". Do you have a surname?

In D20615#463915, @aacid wrote:

Oh, i tried to land the code but the automatic checker complained about your full name being "athurh". Do you have a surname?

Looks like I can't change the username in phabricator's settings.
If some admin can, my complete name is "athurh eof" ;-)

You've sadly triggered my "this is probably a fake name" detector.

At this point we're not sure if we should accept contributions with non real/identifiable names.

See the discussion at https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/2019q2/thread.html

Sadly, I prefer to stay anonymous.
I don't care if my name appears in the commit, so you can push the changes as your own.

Can you explain what are your reasons to want to stay anonymous? Or you feel you'd lose anonymity already by doing so?

Meanwhile, i think it's fair to accept your contribution if you propose a commit to the kde-dev-scripts with this patch

diff --git a/relicensecheck.pl b/relicensecheck.pl
index e9265bf..0aac179 100755
--- a/relicensecheck.pl
+++ b/relicensecheck.pl
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ use List::Util qw(any);
 my %license_table = (
     'acrouthamel'   => ['gplv23', 'lgplv23', 'gplv2+', 'lgplv2+', '+eV', 'CCBYSA4' ],
     'aheinecke'     => ['gplv23', 'lgplv23', 'gplv2+', 'lgplv2+', '+eV', 'CCBYSA4' ],
+    'athurhfree'    => ['gplv23', 'lgplv23', 'gplv2+', 'lgplv2+', '+eV', 'CCBYSA4' ],
     'cgerloff'      => ['gplv23', 'lgplv23', 'gplv2+', 'lgplv2+', '+eV', 'CCBYSA4' ],
     'flherne'       => ['gplv23', 'lgplv23', 'gplv2+', 'lgplv2+', '+eV', 'CCBYSA4' ],
     'huoni'         => ['gplv23', 'lgplv23', 'gplv2+', 'lgplv2+', '+eV', 'CCBYSA4' ],
@@ -409,6 +410,7 @@ my %secondary_mail_addresses = (
     'thb@net-bembel.de' => 'tbaumgart',
     'trev@adblockplus.org' => 'palant',
     'tsdgeos@terra.es' => 'aacid',
+    'athurh@gmail.com' => 'athurhfree',
 );
 
 my %ruletable;

This way we won't have problems if ever we want to relicense the code.

In D20615#467235, @aacid wrote:

Can you explain what are your reasons to want to stay anonymous? Or you feel you'd lose anonymity already by doing so?

There's no particular reason, just privacy.

I could create an account with a random name and everything would be fine.
Since there is no way to verify the names, I don't know why a Random Name is somehow better than a randomnick.

Anyway I have send the patch to kde-dev-scripts.