User Details
- User Since
- Aug 4 2018, 10:53 AM (299 w, 1 d)
- Availability
- Available
Apr 15 2020
There is a more recent version of that file. How to proceed? By creating a new review request for that file with a diff? Or is there a way to associate it with this review request?
Apr 13 2020
Aug 13 2018
Thanks for your help!
I'm on macOS and I only forked from GitHub the syntax-highlighting repo. I don't have the necessary infra-structure to compile KSyntaxHighlighting and generate the reference files. I would very much appreciate if you can take it from here. I did test the updated syntax highlight support for Logtalk by replacing the data/syntax/logtalk.xml in a borrowed Ubuntu box, opening the test file, and checking that everything was highlight perfectly.
Added license to Logtalk highlighting test file.
The test file tests everything that should be highlighted properly. There is no redundancy in it. It is large due to testing all built-in language features, including all that would be called keywords in other languages. It is the same test file that is used to check Logtalk syntax highlighting for two dozens of text editors and syntax highlighters. The original file is part of the Logtalk distribution and thus uses the Apache License 2.0. This version, highlight.lgt can be re-licensed using the license preferred for your project. Note that the contents of the file are just for testing highlighting and make no sense as an actual compilable source code.
How do generate the reference files? No idea of what you mean by " let it run".
Added autotests/input/highlight.lgt file.
Would adding the sample Logtalk source file I mentioned renamed to highlight.lgt to the autotests/input folder do?
Update Logtalk language syntax support per reviewer request.