The numberstyles format methods are not used anywhere
and the corresponding unit test fails.
Afaics all number formatting is done in sheets atm.
The numberstyles format methods are not used anywhere
and the corresponding unit test fails.
Afaics all number formatting is done in sheets atm.
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable. |
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable. |
I doubt words will start using these indeed but still wouldn't they make sense for sheets, and if so i think it makes more sense for the tests to not fail
Yes, think so too, this is really just for 3.0 and mostly for disabling the failing test.
Sheets have exactly the same failing unit test, so planned to fix it there.
I think for 3.1 we should review odf to see if there are code in sheets (or elsewhere) that should be moved to libs.
Disabling+a TODO comment is better than removing indeed. Even better would be #if 0 (better git-blame).
Hmm, I'm looking into sheets formatting and there is no unit test (my mistake) so I'm implementing that.
I'm thinking, maybe we should just XFAIL this test after all.
There is the bigger issue of how to solve number formatting in the future.
Why don't we use icu, or are we waiting for qt to pick it up, or.. ?
Numberstyles: XFAIL scientific number unit tests
Keep all code even if it is not used anywhere