In a world were people update version numbers when they fix bugs, i may make sense.

The world we live in has proven that is not the case and that's why we need auto updating version numbers.

Cheers,

Albert

El diumenge, 1 de març de 2020, a les 23:52:07 CET, Ian Wadham va escriure:

Hi Albert,

Might it make sense to insert a “.0.” after the “2.1” in the hope that someone might come along and fix a bug or two in the gameplay, plus an explanatory comment about that?

The fixer should then bump that zero to indicate that bugs directly affecting end-users had been fixed in that version --- as opposed to the game having changes made to adapt to changing libraries, or receiving fixes to those library-caused changes, or even just being re-released unchanged or with some translation changes (which AFAIK can happen).

Ditto for other KDE Games: many no longer have maintainers.

Cheers,
Ian W.

> On 1 Mar 2020, at 10:57 am, Albert Astals Cid <noreply@phabricator.kde.org> wrote:
>
> View Revision
> aacid created this revision.
> Herald added a reviewer: KDE Games.
> Herald added a subscriber: kde-games-devel.
> aacid requested review of this revision.
>
> REVISION SUMMARY
> Palapeli version was increased to 2.1 "recently" and not so many changes have been done since them
> so asserting the verison number is stuck in the past is a bit too much, but still having it move with
> each new release is important for reproducibility of issues, etc. so compromise and append the version at the end
>
>
> REPOSITORY
> R423 Palapeli
>
> BRANCH
> master
>
> REVISION DETAIL
> https://phabricator.kde.org/D27748
>
> AFFECTED FILES
> CMakeLists.txt
> src/CMakeLists.txt
> src/main.cpp
>
> To: aacid, KDE Games
> Cc: kde-games-devel