hmmmm, the explicitely defined assignment operator is private (old way to delete it). So it seems what we should do is delete it and then delete the copy constructor too?

In D24380#541592, @aacid wrote:

hmmmm, the explicitely defined assignment operator is private (old way to delete it). So it seems what we should do is delete it and then delete the copy constructor too?

Right, however the copy ctor is actually being used here (and seemingly correctly). I'll change the assignment operator to new style deletion though.