No range check is needed here, and operator[] is faster than at()
Description
Description
Details
Details
- Committed
nienhueser Oct 4 2016, 8:22 PM - Parents
- R34:bfc6837b2401: Inline manually (hotspot)
- Branches
- Unknown
- Tags
No range check is needed here, and operator[] is faster than at()
No range check is needed here, and operator[] is faster than at()
Authored by nienhueser on Oct 4 2016, 8:22 PM.
Tags
None
Subscribers
None