Change Details

Tested it with several widgets based KCMs, namely: qtquicksettings, desktoppath and screenlocker. Those three have different situations in term of layouts. Worst case scenario is desktoppath which leads to the right hand side of the fields moving a bit to fit the indicators but that's the price to pay for the feature I guess while keeping things readable. Here is a screenshot how of it looks on the qtquicksettings KCM: {F8181526} Note that the indicators are clickable and reset the field to default value.

Tested it with several widgets based KCMs, namely: qtquicksettings, desktoppath and screenlocker. Those three have different situations in term of layouts. Worst case scenario is desktoppath which leads to the right hand side of the fields moving a bit to fit the indicators but that's the price to pay for the feature I guess while keeping things readable. Here is a screenshot how of it looks on the qtquicksettings KCM: {F8198502} Note that the indicators are clickable and reset the field to default value.

Tested it with several widgets based KCMs, namely: qtquicksettings, desktoppath and screenlocker. Those three have different situations in term of layouts. Worst case scenario is desktoppath which leads to the right hand side of the fields moving a bit to fit the indicators but that's the price to pay for the feature I guess while keeping things readable. Here is a screenshot how of it looks on the qtquicksettings KCM: {F8181526}98502} Note that the indicators are clickable and reset the field to default value.