Hi,
I think since this change:
https://phabricator.kde.org/D11924
we are having this regression in autotests for kwindowsystem:
FAIL! : NetRootInfoTestWM::testSupported() Compared values are not the same
Actual (supportedReply->value_len): 88
Expected (uint32_t(count)) : 87
Loc: [/home/jenkins/workspace/Plasma kwindowsystem kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.9/autotests/netrootinfotestwm.cpp(271)]
so I'm attaching a possible patch for this issue, please be careful because I don't fully understand the code involved.
Regards.
P.S. After the SkipSwticher change there's other regresssion for other test:
FAIL! : KWindowInfoX11Test::testState(skipSwitcher) Compared values are not the same
Loc: [/home/jenkins/workspace/Plasma kwindowsystem kf5-qt5 SUSEQt5.9/autotests/kwindowinfox11test.cpp(230)]
I don't know very well how to solve that one, in Kubuntu's packaging we are just disabling the failing check it like this:
```
--- a/autotests/kwindowinfox11test.cpp
+++ b/autotests/kwindowinfox11test.cpp
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ void KWindowInfoX11Test::testState_data(
QTest::newRow("shaded") << NET::States(NET::Shaded);
QTest::newRow("skipTaskbar") << NET::States(NET::SkipTaskbar);
QTest::newRow("skipPager") << NET::States(NET::SkipPager);
- QTest::newRow("skipSwitcher") << NET::States(NET::SkipSwitcher);
+ //QTest::newRow("skipSwitcher") << NET::States(NET::SkipSwitcher);
QTest::newRow("keep above") << NET::States(NET::KeepAbove);
QTest::newRow("keep below") << NET::States(NET::KeepBelow);
QTest::newRow("fullscreen") << NET::States(NET::FullScreen);
```