Differential D17075

Change to messagelib for D17074
AbandonedPublic
Actions

Authored by davidre on Nov 21 2018, 3:08 PM.

Details

Reviewers
mlaurent
Summary

Just for reference. See D17074

Diff Detail

Repository
R94 PIM: Message Library
Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Unit Tests Skipped
davidre created this revision.Nov 21 2018, 3:08 PM
davidre created this object with visibility "davidre (David Redondo)".
davidre created this object with edit policy "davidre (David Redondo)".
Restricted Application added a project: KDE PIM. · View Herald TranscriptNov 21 2018, 3:08 PM
davidre requested review of this revision.Nov 21 2018, 3:08 PM
davidre updated this revision to Diff 45959.Nov 21 2018, 3:54 PM
davidre changed the visibility from "davidre (David Redondo)" to "Public (No Login Required)".
davidre changed the edit policy from "davidre (David Redondo)" to "All Users".
mlaurent requested changes to this revision.Nov 21 2018, 4:02 PM
mlaurent added a subscriber: mlaurent.

I don't understand your problem.
Why you don't create a new identity ?

I don't like the idea to add a new checkbox "reply to same address" it's an hack.

I have a specific identity for kde so I don't see your specific problem.

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Nov 21 2018, 4:02 PM
davidre added a comment.EditedNov 21 2018, 4:08 PM

The kde@subdomain in D17074 was just an example but now I realize that I didn't make that clear.
I don't have a limited set of addresses for which I could create an Indentity but rather every mail to the domain gets delivered to me and I would like that a conversation that started on a random address to stay there.
My problem is that then I would need to create an Identity everytime I get a message to an address that I haven't used before (or didn't already create an Identity before).

mlaurent added a comment.Nov 21 2018, 4:30 PM

For me it's very too specific feature.
In editor you can specific a From directly.

This hack will just create more bugs.

davidre added a comment.Nov 21 2018, 4:40 PM

I know that this feature is very specific that's the reason I asked about it. I don't see how this specifically would create more bugs if not implemented just like this via a random property.
But anyways thanks for your quick feedback! Maybe I can find something else to contribute in the future.

davidre abandoned this revision.Feb 27 2019, 6:52 AM

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Diff 45959

View Options

messagecomposer/src/helper/messagehelper.cpp

Loading...