Change Details

There have quite a few discussions on the brush editor and why it needs to be improved from a UI standpoint. Brush editor is too large. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360972 Think about how to manage brush thumbnails better https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322677 Stacked brushes and adding more UI complexity https://phabricator.kde.org/T124 It is also currently difficult to find brush presets when you have more than 10-20. This becomes more evident with things like the pixel engine. The preset strip can be a bit difficult to deal with with larger sets of brushes.

There have quite a few discussions on the brush editor and why it needs to be improved from a UI standpoint. Brush editor is too large. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360972 Think about how to manage brush thumbnails better https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322677 Stacked brushes and adding more UI complexity https://phabricator.kde.org/T124 It is currently difficult to find and identify brush presets when you have more than 10-20. You cannot see their names, so you have to click around if that is what you are searching by. This becomes more evident with things like the pixel engine. maybe other things to think about with this that I am not considering...

There have quite a few discussions on the brush editor and why it needs to be improved from a UI standpoint. Brush editor is too large. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360972 Think about how to manage brush thumbnails better https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322677 Stacked brushes and adding more UI complexity https://phabricator.kde.org/T124 It is alsos currently difficult to find and identify brush presets when you have more than 10-20. This becomes more evident with things like the pixel engineYou cannot see their names, so you have to click around if that is what you are searching by. The preset strip can be a bit difficult to deal with with larger sets of brushes. is becomes more evident with things like the pixel engine. maybe other things to think about with this that I am not considering...