Some PIM repositories contain ancient code which ideally shall be relicensed.
The current situation is already problematic, mixing incompatible licenses is normally not allowed
- `GPL-2.0-only` files shall be relicensed to `GPL-2.0-or-later` or `GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only OR LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-GPL` (ie: give authority to the KDE e.V. if the GPL-3.0 license has a successor in the future)
- `LGPL-2.0-only` files shall be relicensed to `LGPL-2.0-or-later` or `LGPL-2.0-only OR LGPL-3.0-only OR LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-LGPL` (ie: give authority to the KDE e.V. if the LGPL-3.0 license has a successor in the future)
This is a challenging task, some PIM files are more than 20 years old and not all contributors added their name to the relicensecheck.pl script.
(last update: 2020-09-09)
GPL-2.0-only:
- pimcommon: 54 files
- libkleo: 12 files
- messagelib: 34 files
- mailimporter: 58 files
- mailcommon: 109 files
- libksieve: 80 files
- kdepim-addons: 39 files
- akonadiconsole: 10 files
- kleopatra: 9 files
- kmail: 82 files
- korganizer: 2 files
LGPL-2.0-only:
- akonadi: 2 files
- kmime: 2 files
- kimap: 1 file
- kmbox: 1 file
- messagelib: 2 files
- kleopatra: 1 file
- kmail: 2 files