Change Details

We need clear guidelines on which Merge Requests and Issues should be tagged as "Noteworthy". Of course, all MR's and commits are noteworthy and important - but only some are promotable by KDE Promo. **Examples of noteworthy changes:** - User facing feature additions (e.g. //New useful effect added to Kdenlive//) - Big changes in UI (e.g. //all KCM rewrites//) - Long-standing, annoying bugs (e.g. //Rework of the previously bug-ridden MTP implementation in KIO//) - Large technology shifts (e.g. //Port to Qt 6//) - Significant performance improvements **Examples of changes not considerent noteworthy: ** - Small UX annoyances and fixes. Whilst those add up to something very important, the individual changes (e.g. "more consistent padding in dialogs") are not interesting to users. - Shifts in technology that do not affect the behavior of the product (e.g. //porting from library X version Y to library X version Y+1//)

We need clear guidelines on which Merge Requests and Issues should be tagged as "Noteworthy". Of course, all MR's and commits are noteworthy and important - but only some are promotable by KDE Promo. **Examples of noteworthy changes:** - User facing feature additions (e.g. //New useful effect added to Kdenlive//) - Big changes in UI (e.g. //a KCM is rewritten in QML and now looks distinctively different//) - Long-standing, annoying bugs (e.g. //Rework of the previously bug-ridden MTP implementation in KIO//) - Large technology shifts (e.g. //Port to Qt 6//) - Significant performance improvements **Examples of changes not considerent noteworthy: ** - Small UX annoyances and fixes. Whilst those add up to something very important, the individual changes (e.g. "more consistent padding in dialogs") are not interesting to users. - Shifts in technology that do not affect the behavior of the product (e.g. //porting from library X version Y to library X version Y+1//)

We need clear guidelines on which Merge Requests and Issues should be tagged as "Noteworthy". Of course, all MR's and commits are noteworthy and important - but only some are promotable by KDE Promo. **Examples of noteworthy changes:** - User facing feature additions (e.g. //New useful effect added to Kdenlive//) - Big changes in UI (e.g. //all//a KCM is rewrites//tten in QML and now looks distinctively different//) - Long-standing, annoying bugs (e.g. //Rework of the previously bug-ridden MTP implementation in KIO//) - Large technology shifts (e.g. //Port to Qt 6//) - Significant performance improvements **Examples of changes not considerent noteworthy: ** - Small UX annoyances and fixes. Whilst those add up to something very important, the individual changes (e.g. "more consistent padding in dialogs") are not interesting to users. - Shifts in technology that do not affect the behavior of the product (e.g. //porting from library X version Y to library X version Y+1//)