**Problem**
Krita contains a large number of tools for painters, a large number of settings and features. Their number increases every year, but not all of them are popular. More precisely, the critics want to know which of the options are popular. Based on this information, you can determine the vector of further work, finalize popular, but not too well-implemented features, remove old, useless functions. Use of clickstream analytics will help to learn the popularity of features.
The collection of statistics will help to create achievements to the Steam. Achievements for Krita is good marketing solution, which help us to find new users. It would be reasonable to make two versions: Steam version and non-Steam version. All the information sent will be completely anonymous for the non-Steam version , and will also be collected with direct user’s permission . For users of the Steam version, the collected information necessary to achievements, will be associated with their steam-profiles.
Full version of proposal you can read [[ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xxf6hONNDCnCWuG3vfo9Tjui87yBF86T1rRlKr8ptLA/edit?usp=sharing | here. ]]
**Сurrent status**
[13.05.2017] Was created [[ https://akapust1n.wordpress.com/2017/05/06/choice-of-library-for-selection/ | blog ]] on planet.kde.org. The blog offered changes to the used libraries in the project. The creator of the library kuserfedbachk was attracted to this record for to discuss technical nuances :)
A site for temporary telemetry mapping has been created(akapustin.me). Site isn't ready now. [[ https://github.com/akapust1n/kritaFrontend | Sources of site.]]
**Plan**
Deploy kuserfeedback backend server and try to sent basic information(like version of QT) to this server.