I'm happy that the discussion has come back, but sadly the proposal has missed the deadline to be included in the voting.
Of course, feel free to continue using the ticket for discussing the ideas mentioned in the proposal.

As the author did not act on the comments here, I will not move this proposal to the voting stage.

As the author did not act on the comments here, I will not move this proposal to the voting stage.

@ws I agree that this could be part of the accessibility Goal proposal, based on this discussion I propose to not move this to the voting stage. Of course, feel free to submit your ideas in the other proposal!

Thanks @cwunder, based on your response, I will not move the Goal proposal to the voting stage, but you're very welcome to talk to our Promo team to discuss the overall ideas of visible collaboration between the two projects.

The voting starts in a week, if you plan to update the proposal it is best to do it soon.

The voting starts in a week, if you plan to update the proposal it is best to do it soon.

The voting starts in a week, if you plan to update the proposal it is best to do it soon. @ngraham do you feel that the proposal right now is how you want it to be before voting or are you still working on it?

The voting starts in a week, if you plan to update the proposal it best to do it soon.

The voting starts in a week, if you plan to update the proposal it best to do it soon.

The voting starts in a week, so any changes that you intend to do should be done soon :)

The voting starts in a week, so any changes that you intend to do should be done soon :)

The voting starts in a week, so any changes that you intend to do should be done soon :)

The voting starts in a week, so any changes that you intend to do should be done soon :)

Notes from refinement session:

Notes from the refinement session:

Notes from refinement session:

Notes from refinement session:

Notes from the refinement session:

Personally, the name of the Goal would probably needs some work

Notes from refinement session:

Note from the refinement session:

Notes from the refinement session:

Adding Jonathan and Harald, as their input will probably be very important here.

Notes from the refinement session:

Notes from the refinement session:

Hi @barkingbandicoot it looks like you've submitted this proposal after the deadline. Perhaps you can think how you can integrate your ideas as part of one of the existing proposals?

@cwunder It's here: https://phabricator.kde.org/T15607

Please use the provided template to submit a Goal proposal.
Note that this is not a wish list board, for ideas for specific apps or parts of the system use https://bugs.kde.org/

In T13198#258784, @allyson wrote:

In T13198#258782, @adam wrote:

Youtube personalities/Influencers etc that could be contacted:

Level1 Techs
Anthony from Linus Tech Tips
Gaming on Linux

Adam do you have any way to contact them or could you do so?

Youtube personalities/Influencers etc that could be contacted:

Level1 Techs
Anthony from Linus Tech Tips
Gaming on Linux

In T14453#255533, @paulb wrote:

Local server under my desk!

Here's a rendered animation at 30fps. Can you take a look and see if it looks smooth enough for you? My criteria is rubbish.

In T14453#255531, @paulb wrote:

The problem we have is rendering: 300 frames (about 10 seconds of video) can take up to 8 or 10 hours to render (if we use Blender). So, for 60 frames, double that. We need to compromise between smoothness of the animation and how much actual time we can spend rendering.

One suggestion/request for the video is to have a 60fps version rendered to be used in supported players, such as YouTube.

I can staff as well.

Email me the list at adam.szopa@kde.org after you narrow it down to your liking please :)

A simple skeleton of the survey: https://survey.kde.org/327193?lang=en

We could first ask a general question about which previous Akademies has the user attended, and then in the following ranking questions only those sessions/speakers would appear in the lists.

@cblack can you help me with the descriptions of the item you added and the one above it? What is the difference between them and do you think that the way they are worded right now reflects that difference? I want it to be clear in the poll.

In T12924#225638, @aacid wrote:

if this is for trainings you need to make it quite clear in the subject and text, otherwise it seems you're trying to define the conference talks topics