In D17375#373278, @ngraham wrote:

That's what I thought. Then it doesn't fully fix 401810, since people not using Kubuntu or Neon will still not have a way to change the update frequency.

In D17375#373049, @ngraham wrote:

This helps for Kubuntu (and Neon ?) users, but what about everyone else?

Seems good to me, and a quick test on a stock Kubuntu install gets the updater registering new updates when the system does its own refresh.

@tsimonq2 is going to document, based on lubuntu's switch, what we would need to do. Once we have that then we can make an informed assessment on whether this can be targeted for 19.04.

I think this is needed in 18.12 branch as well?

And we have a casualty from this ;)

Can easily make a test exfat volume to mount in virtualbox, so should be simple to test. Similar code to install samba via packagekit exists in kdenetwork-filesharing source, so this should be possible.

Ok. Could be doable. My initial comment stands though. I would want a legal OK from higher up.

$ seeded-in-ubuntu fuse-exfat
fuse-exfat's binaries are not seeded.

Doubt we can do this unless this can be shown to be wrong AND it gets ok'd by Ubuntu/Canonical legally.

In D16388#348767, @pino wrote:

In D16388#348765, @rikmills wrote:

Build failure:

See D16406: Fix build with poppler<0.64.

Build failure:

In R883:1523438#3706443, @ltoscano wrote:

Hi @Wantoyo , the Ubuntu packagers (namely @rikmills) noticed that you changed a lot of translated strings back to English.
The changes propagated to the stable LTS branch too (5.12), so as the packagers tried to update the LTS packages on Ubuntu, the Ubuntu stable release updated team is puzzled by this unusual change in stable branch.

Was this change intended?

Not sure I 100% believe this, as:

• That package only contains the gnome config GUI and auth dialog.
• On Kubuntu support/IRC recently, a couple of people successfully set up openvpn with just the network-manager-openvpn package (the gnome one installs this as a dep)

Will have to investigate properly...

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/1.379

Reminder. Final freeze on Thursday.

In D16031#339149, @ngraham wrote:

It's a bit frustrating to spend a lot of time in the phab task (T9658) getting consensus on a design, implement it, and then hear, "no, no, major elements of this design needs to be rethought." I understand that sometimes implementation reveals issues that were unforeseen during the original discussion, but let's keep the discussion in T9658 or else it will be very hard to follow scattered in two places.

In T8586#163003, @scarlettclark wrote:

ok did all that and not seeing jobs still. But on another note - the first one I tried I have changelog madness. How do we want to handle those?

Fails to build on Neon and Kubuntu CI

Test plan completed. Builds successfully with packagekit-qt 1.0.1 and restores expected functionality.

Fails to build on:

Is this needed in the 0.3 branch now?

In T9128#161276, @ngraham wrote:

+1 for Krita only if size is a concern. It's pretty big these days.

Ok. If we do this, I would suggest:

These are not the smallest of apps in terms of adding to our iso size. Not sure I am convinced.

Any conclusions?

In D15717#330808, @ngraham wrote:

Landed on master, so the change will show up in KDE Plasma 5.15. See https://community.kde.org/Schedules/Plasma_5 for more information.

In D6513#326071, @ngraham wrote:

FYI, this included an ABI change to SearchRequest that broke Discover: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398412

Landed in -release. Please test.

Should build and reach release pocket in a few hrs, as p-d has no tests.

I was already considering this patch, after I noticed it had been merged into the 5.13 branch but would not get released in 5.13 as there are no more bugfix releases.

We are in feature freeze and approaching beta freeze, so this needs looked at soon or left for next release.

Must test as 5.13 is through.....

Ok. In that case the new bug with the single commit fix for solid can stand as the new tracker for this. :)

I will mark the original bug as invalid anyway.

In T9525#157248, @ngraham wrote:

It's a little different.

In T9525#157245, @rikmills wrote:

@ngraham So this is not the same as?

@ngraham So this is not the same as?

In T9525#157242, @ngraham wrote:

Gotcha, thanks. One reason why I prefer Phab is that I can never find the right component on Launchpad. I am not able to find the Launchpad page corresponding to the KDE Solid Framework package. Where should I file it?