For GCompris, it listed those 5 failures:
- "branding-has-primary-brand-colors"
- "app-icon-footprint"
- "app-icon-in-line-with-contemporary-styles"
- "app-summary-not-too-long"
- "app-summary-no-weird-formatting"
For GCompris, it listed those 5 failures:
I'll take a look at that soon.
All completed :)
I've just done some big clean-up and improvements to this activity. About your first request, that won't really change as the way it works is to move an item by clicking on its destination slot, which in my opinion is good. But the visual improvements should make it more obvious (before the ListView was not clipped, so it could show an extra item not clickable on the bottom, which was indeed confusing).
Task completed last year, closing as resolved.
Task completed last year, closing as resolved.
I've found a good command-line software that is able to find solutions for this type of game. We can probably use it as reference or reuse some of its code for this hint feature.
Done for Andika update.
I already have the base logic part working :)
I think I'll go with something like this:
I'll work on updating the screenshots page.
Front page updated. I also did some global style changes visible on all pages. Already available on https://gcompris.net
Screenshots updated on the fastlane folder (on master and 2.0 branches) and on the playstore.
I'm ok with the idea to add short definition for some words to make life of translators easier.
I see you changed mockups for activity 2 using colors for the pairs slots. This is not good, as we should never base a design only on color difference to make sure it's always usable even for colorblind people.
So please:
For level 3, 4 and 5, I think it would need to have a visual clue showing which pairs go together...
Something like this (brackets here symbolizing a rectangle container or something like that...):
I'll take care of that.
I've tested quickly, it works fine.
Thank you!
All done (or almost, still waiting for the erase images from Karl, who is still working on it).
Images removed for the new words-webp.rcc, so closing as resolved.
I already started working on it, but it takes time as I also replace some photos in some activities (currently in categorization especially, it's a bit long but soon finished).
In most cases, resizing not lossless with quality 90 is OK and already saves some space. For other cases like erase activity images, if we replace those with higher resolution images, they'll probably need to be compressed with quality 50 or 40 to have an acceptable size.