- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Sep 25 2017
Aug 19 2017
Aug 18 2017
Aug 16 2017
Aug 14 2017
Aug 8 2017
Aug 6 2017
Aug 3 2017
Aug 1 2017
Jul 26 2017
Jul 25 2017
Jul 19 2017
Jul 18 2017
Jul 16 2017
Jul 13 2017
Jul 6 2017
Jul 5 2017
In D6316#121700, @brauch wrote:Doesn't that become a problem when you extend the range during editing?
Oh, got it. Yeah, there is some problems with method declaration context if I don't update range. Syntax highlighting works fine but there is problems with code browsers, looks like it cannot find correct context by range. Updating range by currentContext()->setRange(editorFindRange(node, 0)); helps but I'm not sure that it's correct since there could be some other declarations not related to that type between type declaration and method declaration; although, looks like it works.
In D6316#121700, @brauch wrote:No, I was thinking that the next block with the openContext(...) should automatically re-use the internalContext() of the declaration if that is indeed the same. In any case, when looking at it like this, don't you need to set the new range on the context? Doesn't that become a problem when you extend the range during editing?
Jul 4 2017
Jul 2 2017
Jun 28 2017
Updated. Based on https://phabricator.kde.org/D6412 work. Now code highlighting works correctly too.
Thank you for your review!
Use review suggestion.
Jun 27 2017
Jun 26 2017
Yeah, looks like there is problem with reusing but not because of 2 runs - visitMethodDeclaration opens new declaration for type :-/
See code and resulting DU-Chain: https://paste.kde.org/pmjuqk7ld (declarations on lines 14 and 15)
I tried to:
Jun 25 2017
If I do that inside
In D6316#119456, @brauch wrote:I wonder -- is this the right place for that logic? Does it work in highlighting, for example?
Jun 24 2017
Jun 23 2017
Jun 21 2017
Jun 19 2017
In D5188#117158, @apol wrote:What needs to happen to have this merged?
Jun 17 2017
Jun 14 2017
Remove unneeded comment.
Jun 13 2017
Set tool view for build job.
Add project files filter
May 16 2017
In D5188#110166, @arrowdodger wrote:In D5188#110152, @ematirov wrote:There is no "project file" in Go, but specifying "*.go" as mimetype works perfect.
Doesn't Go has its own build system? This should serve as "project file", like Makefiles or CMakeLists.txt for C/C++.
In D5188#109400, @mwolff wrote:Ping? I think other than the mimetype issue, this is OK to get merged. Do you have commit rights?
Mar 30 2017
Mar 29 2017
Fix review suggestions. Make folders of project buildable by right-clicking.
Suggestions about naming are welcome - I renamed folder to buildsystem but classes should have Go prefix I think, for easier debug \ etc. (It looks strange to make break BuildSystem::methodName without prefix IMHO). However, I'm not sure if files should contains that "Go" prefix.
Mar 26 2017
Mar 25 2017
Feb 24 2017
Dec 5 2016
LGTM, thanks.
Dec 3 2016
LGTM!
Thanks, good work.
Thanks! Just some more nitpicks.