Aug 8 2017
Jun 23 2017
Sorry, forgot about this one. Thanks for taking action here. :)
May 3 2017
As discussed on IRC, there will be some changes in a future revision...
After reading https://medium.com/genymobile/how-c-lambda-expressions-can-improve-your-qt-code-8cd524f4ed9f I get the impression that capturing this is common practice.
I am not very familiar with labdas either and was just wondering. It works well here with =, & and this but I do not know the best practices in this case.
Just out of curiosity. Why do you pass by value?
Although I do not like those "just delay it a bit and it will work" solutions that much, I also think it's a valid workaround here. :)
Apr 25 2017
I don't know of any advantage/disadvantage... I can convert it to pointers if you want. Just an example I had was with objects and the code is one line shorter...
Apr 24 2017
Thanks, looks good to me.
Just curious. Is there (dis)advantages of using the QLabel as pointer vs. value here? I see is used as pointer in other games and used it like that as well.
Apr 19 2017
Sep 10 2016
Jun 9 2016
May 18 2016
Apr 28 2016
Apr 26 2016
I think it's a good idea to folow the kdelibs coding guidelines closely. You are not kdelibs however, so you can define your own rules.
Apr 25 2016
BTW: GCC6 warns about misleading "if" indentation in:
Not sure what you mean by "fix".
Usually translators (me included) fix their translations and then on your next release you fetch those translations.
Apr 24 2016
Apr 23 2016
Apr 13 2016
Da würde ich den opensuse-Weg gehen.
Apr 12 2016
Was wollen wir denn als Namen hinschreiben?