Changeset View
Changeset View
Standalone View
Standalone View
src/kcolorschememanager.cpp
| Show All 16 Lines | |||||
| 17 | * Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. | 17 | * Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. | ||
| 18 | */ | 18 | */ | ||
| 19 | #include "kcolorschememanager.h" | 19 | #include "kcolorschememanager.h" | ||
| 20 | #include "kcolorschememanager_p.h" | 20 | #include "kcolorschememanager_p.h" | ||
| 21 | 21 | | |||
| 22 | #include <kactionmenu.h> | 22 | #include <kactionmenu.h> | ||
| 23 | #include <kconfiggroup.h> | 23 | #include <kconfiggroup.h> | ||
| 24 | #include <kcolorscheme.h> | 24 | #include <kcolorscheme.h> | ||
| 25 | #include <klocalizedstring.h> | ||||
| 25 | #include <ksharedconfig.h> | 26 | #include <ksharedconfig.h> | ||
| 26 | 27 | | |||
| 27 | #include <QApplication> | 28 | #include <QApplication> | ||
| 28 | #include <QDir> | 29 | #include <QDir> | ||
| 29 | #include <QFileInfo> | 30 | #include <QFileInfo> | ||
| 30 | #include <QMenu> | 31 | #include <QMenu> | ||
| 31 | #include <QPainter> | 32 | #include <QPainter> | ||
| 32 | #include <QStandardPaths> | 33 | #include <QStandardPaths> | ||
| 34 | #include <QStyle> | ||||
| 33 | 35 | | |||
| 34 | KColorSchemeManagerPrivate::KColorSchemeManagerPrivate() | 36 | KColorSchemeManagerPrivate::KColorSchemeManagerPrivate() | ||
| 35 | : model(new KColorSchemeModel()) | 37 | : model(new KColorSchemeModel()) | ||
| 36 | { | 38 | { | ||
| 37 | } | 39 | } | ||
| 38 | 40 | | |||
| 39 | KColorSchemeModel::KColorSchemeModel(QObject *parent) | 41 | KColorSchemeModel::KColorSchemeModel(QObject *parent) | ||
| 40 | : QAbstractListModel(parent) | 42 | : QAbstractListModel(parent) | ||
| ▲ Show 20 Lines • Show All 56 Lines • ▼ Show 20 Line(s) | 97 | for (const QString &schemeFile : qAsConst(schemeFiles)) { | |||
| 97 | KConfigGroup group(config, QStringLiteral("General")); | 99 | KConfigGroup group(config, QStringLiteral("General")); | ||
| 98 | const QString name = group.readEntry("Name", QFileInfo(schemeFile).baseName()); | 100 | const QString name = group.readEntry("Name", QFileInfo(schemeFile).baseName()); | ||
| 99 | const KColorSchemeModelData data = {name, schemeFile, QIcon()}; | 101 | const KColorSchemeModelData data = {name, schemeFile, QIcon()}; | ||
| 100 | m_data.append(data); | 102 | m_data.append(data); | ||
| 101 | } | 103 | } | ||
| 102 | std::sort(m_data.begin(), m_data.end(), [](const KColorSchemeModelData & first, const KColorSchemeModelData & second) { | 104 | std::sort(m_data.begin(), m_data.end(), [](const KColorSchemeModelData & first, const KColorSchemeModelData & second) { | ||
| 103 | return first.name < second.name; | 105 | return first.name < second.name; | ||
| 104 | }); | 106 | }); | ||
| 107 | m_data.prepend({i18n("System color scheme"), QString(), QIcon::fromTheme("edit-undo")}); | ||||
asemke: Many applications like kdevelop, digikam, labplot, etc. create a menu "Color Scheme" in the… | |||||
"Default" is probably fine. FWIW the parent menu item is actually mis-named, at least in Kate. It's called "Color Theme" when it should be "Color Scheme" Also this menu should be universal, and not re-implemented on a per-app basis. ngraham: "Default" is probably fine.
FWIW the parent menu item is actually mis-named, at least in Kate. | |||||
Yes, was also wrong in LabPlot. Just corrected https://invent.kde.org/kde/labplot/commit/262f37b59193ed88bf680b155dc6ecd37bd11419. We should have maybe in this class only one public function KActionMenu *createSchemeSelectionMenu(QObject *parent) which internally sets the string to "Color Scheme" and the icon to "preferences-desktop-color". With this we'd enforce a consistent look. Or this is menu is automatically created for KXmlGuiWindow applications... asemke: Yes, was also wrong in LabPlot. Just corrected https://invent.kde. | |||||
That's what I was thinking of, yeah. ngraham: > Or this is menu is automatically created for KXmlGuiWindow applications...
That's what I was… | |||||
| 105 | endResetModel(); | 108 | endResetModel(); | ||
| 106 | } | 109 | } | ||
| 107 | 110 | | |||
| 108 | QIcon KColorSchemeModel::createPreview(const QString &path) const | 111 | QIcon KColorSchemeModel::createPreview(const QString &path) const | ||
| 109 | { | 112 | { | ||
| 110 | KSharedConfigPtr schemeConfig = KSharedConfig::openConfig(path, KConfig::SimpleConfig); | 113 | KSharedConfigPtr schemeConfig = KSharedConfig::openConfig(path, KConfig::SimpleConfig); | ||
| 111 | QIcon result; | 114 | QIcon result; | ||
| 112 | 115 | | |||
| Show All 35 Lines | |||||
| 148 | 151 | | |||
| 149 | QAbstractItemModel *KColorSchemeManager::model() const | 152 | QAbstractItemModel *KColorSchemeManager::model() const | ||
| 150 | { | 153 | { | ||
| 151 | return d->model.data(); | 154 | return d->model.data(); | ||
| 152 | } | 155 | } | ||
| 153 | 156 | | |||
| 154 | QModelIndex KColorSchemeManager::indexForScheme(const QString &name) const | 157 | QModelIndex KColorSchemeManager::indexForScheme(const QString &name) const | ||
| 155 | { | 158 | { | ||
| 159 | if (name.isEmpty()) { | ||||
Propose to add a short comment explaining why we return index(0) here for the future code reader starting off at this code before having read all code and docs. E.g. kossebau: Propose to add a short comment explaining why we return index(0) here for the future code… | |||||
| 160 | return d->model->index(0); | ||||
| 161 | } | ||||
| 156 | for (int i = 0; i < d->model->rowCount(); ++i) { | 162 | for (int i = 0; i < d->model->rowCount(); ++i) { | ||
kossebau: Could start off at 1 now, no? | |||||
| 157 | QModelIndex index = d->model->index(i); | 163 | QModelIndex index = d->model->index(i); | ||
| 158 | if (index.data().toString() == name) { | 164 | if (index.data().toString() == name) { | ||
| 159 | return index; | 165 | return index; | ||
| 160 | } | 166 | } | ||
| 161 | } | 167 | } | ||
| 162 | return QModelIndex(); | 168 | return QModelIndex(); | ||
| 163 | } | 169 | } | ||
| 164 | 170 | | |||
| 165 | KActionMenu *KColorSchemeManager::createSchemeSelectionMenu(const QIcon &icon, const QString &name, const QString &selectedSchemeName, QObject *parent) | 171 | KActionMenu *KColorSchemeManager::createSchemeSelectionMenu(const QIcon &icon, const QString &name, const QString &selectedSchemeName, QObject *parent) | ||
| 166 | { | 172 | { | ||
| 167 | KActionMenu *menu = new KActionMenu(icon, name, parent); | 173 | KActionMenu *menu = new KActionMenu(icon, name, parent); | ||
| 168 | QActionGroup *group = new QActionGroup(menu); | 174 | QActionGroup *group = new QActionGroup(menu); | ||
| 169 | connect(group, &QActionGroup::triggered, [](QAction * action) { | 175 | connect(group, &QActionGroup::triggered, this, [this](QAction * action) { | ||
| 170 | // hint for the style to synchronize the color scheme with the window manager/compositor | 176 | // hint for the style to synchronize the color scheme with the window manager/compositor | ||
| 171 | qApp->setProperty("KDE_COLOR_SCHEME_PATH", action->data()); | 177 | activateScheme(d->model->index(action->data().toInt())); | ||
| 172 | qApp->setPalette(KColorScheme::createApplicationPalette(KSharedConfig::openConfig(action->data().toString()))); | | |||
| 173 | }); | 178 | }); | ||
| 174 | for (int i = 0; i < d->model->rowCount(); ++i) { | 179 | for (int i = 0; i < d->model->rowCount(); ++i) { | ||
| 175 | QModelIndex index = d->model->index(i); | 180 | QModelIndex index = d->model->index(i); | ||
| 176 | QAction *action = new QAction(index.data(Qt::DisplayRole).toString(), menu); | 181 | QAction *action = new QAction(index.data(Qt::DisplayRole).toString(), menu); | ||
| 177 | action->setData(index.data(Qt::UserRole)); | 182 | action->setData(index.row()); | ||
| 178 | action->setActionGroup(group); | 183 | action->setActionGroup(group); | ||
| 179 | action->setCheckable(true); | 184 | action->setCheckable(true); | ||
| 180 | if (index.data().toString() == selectedSchemeName) { | 185 | if (index.data().toString() == selectedSchemeName) { | ||
| 181 | action->setChecked(true); | 186 | action->setChecked(true); | ||
| 182 | } | 187 | } | ||
| 183 | menu->addAction(action); | 188 | menu->addAction(action); | ||
| 184 | } | 189 | } | ||
| 185 | 190 | if (!group->checkedAction()) { | |||
| 191 | group->actions()[0]->setChecked(true); | ||||
| 192 | } | ||||
also could get a short comment what the highlevel logic is here kossebau: also could get a short comment what the highlevel logic is here
`// no color theme selected? so… | |||||
| 186 | connect(menu->menu(), &QMenu::aboutToShow, group, [this, group] { | 193 | connect(menu->menu(), &QMenu::aboutToShow, group, [this, group] { | ||
| 187 | const auto actions = group->actions(); | 194 | const auto actions = group->actions(); | ||
| 188 | for (QAction *action : actions) { | 195 | for (QAction *action : actions) { | ||
| 189 | if (action->icon().isNull()) { | 196 | if (action->icon().isNull()) { | ||
| 190 | action->setIcon(d->model->createPreview(action->data().toString())); | 197 | action->setIcon(d->model->index(action->data().toInt()).data(Qt::DecorationRole).value<QIcon>()); | ||
| 191 | } | 198 | } | ||
| 192 | } | 199 | } | ||
| 193 | }); | 200 | }); | ||
| 194 | 201 | | |||
| 195 | return menu; | 202 | return menu; | ||
| 196 | } | 203 | } | ||
| 197 | 204 | | |||
| 198 | KActionMenu *KColorSchemeManager::createSchemeSelectionMenu(const QString &text, const QString &selectedSchemeName, QObject *parent) | 205 | KActionMenu *KColorSchemeManager::createSchemeSelectionMenu(const QString &text, const QString &selectedSchemeName, QObject *parent) | ||
| 199 | { | 206 | { | ||
| 200 | return createSchemeSelectionMenu(QIcon(), text, selectedSchemeName, parent); | 207 | return createSchemeSelectionMenu(QIcon(), text, selectedSchemeName, parent); | ||
| 201 | } | 208 | } | ||
| 202 | 209 | | |||
| 203 | KActionMenu *KColorSchemeManager::createSchemeSelectionMenu(const QString &selectedSchemeName, QObject *parent) | 210 | KActionMenu *KColorSchemeManager::createSchemeSelectionMenu(const QString &selectedSchemeName, QObject *parent) | ||
| 204 | { | 211 | { | ||
| 205 | return createSchemeSelectionMenu(QIcon(), QString(), selectedSchemeName, parent); | 212 | return createSchemeSelectionMenu(QIcon(), QString(), selectedSchemeName, parent); | ||
| 206 | } | 213 | } | ||
| 207 | 214 | | |||
| 215 | KActionMenu *KColorSchemeManager::createSchemeSelectionMenu (QObject *parent) | ||||
| 216 | { | ||||
| 217 | return createSchemeSelectionMenu(QIcon(),QString(), QString(), parent); | ||||
why not to use reasonable default values here like QIcon::fromTheme(QStringLiteral("preferences-desktop-color") and i18n("Color Scheme")? This function should be used then by all applications and this will help to get a more consistent behavior across the different applications. asemke: why not to use reasonable default values here like QIcon::fromTheme(QStringLiteral("preferences… | |||||
Should we also do this for the other overloads? Or would that behavior change be a blocker? ALso an application would want to call KColorSchemeManager::createSchemeSelectionMenu(const QString &selectedSchemeName, QObject *parent) probably if the custom scheme is saved between launches. davidre: Should we also do this for the other overloads? Or would that behavior change be a blocker? | |||||
I'm not the author of this code but I don't see why this should be a blocker. With this you wouldn't break anything and would simply add more consistency across different applications. asemke: I'm not the author of this code but I don't see why this should be a blocker. With this you… | |||||
| 218 | } | ||||
| 219 | | ||||
| 208 | void KColorSchemeManager::activateScheme(const QModelIndex &index) | 220 | void KColorSchemeManager::activateScheme(const QModelIndex &index) | ||
| 209 | { | 221 | { | ||
| 210 | if (!index.isValid()) { | 222 | if (!index.isValid()) { | ||
| 211 | return; | 223 | return; | ||
| 212 | } | 224 | } | ||
| 213 | if (index.model() != d->model.data()) { | 225 | if (index.model() != d->model.data()) { | ||
| 214 | return; | 226 | return; | ||
| 215 | } | 227 | } | ||
| 216 | // hint for the style to synchronize the color scheme with the window manager/compositor | 228 | // hint for the style to synchronize the color scheme with the window manager/compositor | ||
Using // for each comment line is more typical for explanation comments, why the different style here? kossebau: Using `//` for each comment line is more typical for explanation comments, why the different… | |||||
| 217 | qApp->setProperty("KDE_COLOR_SCHEME_PATH", index.data(Qt::UserRole)); | 229 | qApp->setProperty("KDE_COLOR_SCHEME_PATH", index.data(Qt::UserRole)); | ||
| 230 | if (index.data(Qt::UserRole).toString().isNull()) { | ||||
Because I didn't see another multiline comment in this file to compare to ;) davidre: Because I didn't see another multiline comment in this file to compare to ;) | |||||
| 231 | qApp->setPalette(qApp->style()->standardPalette()); | ||||
| 232 | } else { | ||||
| 218 | qApp->setPalette(KColorScheme::createApplicationPalette(KSharedConfig::openConfig(index.data(Qt::UserRole).toString()))); | 233 | qApp->setPalette(KColorScheme::createApplicationPalette(KSharedConfig::openConfig(index.data(Qt::UserRole).toString()))); | ||
| 219 | } | 234 | } | ||
| 235 | } | ||||
| 236 | | ||||
| 237 | void KColorSchemeManager::followSystemScheme() | ||||
| 238 | { | ||||
| 239 | activateScheme(d->model->index(0)); | ||||
asemke: if (index.row() == 0) would also do the job and is simpler and faster. | |||||
| 240 | } | ||||
Many applications like kdevelop, digikam, labplot, etc. create a menu "Color Scheme" in the main menu bar and add then menu item via KColorSchemeManager. By using "System color scheme" here we'd have "Color Scheme" -> "System color scheme" with this repeated "color scheme" string. Can we simply use "Default" or "System" or "Desktop" here?