Unfortunately this doesn't cover all LGPLv2-only files.
I cannot find a way to contact Bernhard Loos
(and didn't get a reply from Martijn Klingens)
NO_CHANGELOG
Unfortunately this doesn't cover all LGPLv2-only files.
I cannot find a way to contact Bernhard Loos
(and didn't get a reply from Martijn Klingens)
NO_CHANGELOG
Builds
No Linters Available |
No Unit Test Coverage |
Buildable 19830 | |
Build 19848: arc lint + arc unit |
Note that you don't have a LGPL-2.0-or-later COPYING file in this repo (there's also no LGPL-2.0-only).
COPYING.LIB contains the LGPL-2.1 license which is used by one file in the tests/ folder
Indeed, I never think about those COPYING files. In fact this is something that is definitely inconsistent in most of the frameworks right now...
src/services/kservicefactory.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
4–9 | What's the reason for only changing this one to LGPL2 only or LGPL3 only (without the eV clause)? |
src/services/kservicefactory.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
4–9 | The reason is Waldo Bastian, who agreed to 2-or-3 but not to 2+ waba ( 17 LOC): 7ee6ea605e,ec1dc9339f,307504885e,764b51a72c,f1d9d663e6,010677452e,79787d4962,5dcce58a32,0ef36944f8 He did agree to +eV, but others didn't (lunakl, mueller). I guess this can then be turned into 2+ by asking the eV, but is that worth the trouble? |
src/services/kservicefactory.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
4–9 |
Nope, The e.V. can't turn 2.0-only to 2.0-or-later. The proxy is only allowed to act on future versions of the license |