Lot of mobile devices, as well as tablet devices use the DSI connector,
for internal screens. This is more common in ARM devices, so consider
them as internal display as well.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
romangg - Group Reviewers
KWin - Commits
- R108:ef5406990eb5: [platforms/drm] Consider DSI connector type to be internal display
checked on the device with DSI screen, it was considered internal
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- R108 KWin
- Lint
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable. - Unit
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable.
Comment Actions
This bit is mostly unused apart from the orientation sensor enabling, but nevertheless, I want to commit this to Plasma/5.17 branch (to make it easier for me to test rotation patch further on some of target devices)
Comment Actions
Just quickly checking Wikipedia it shows an image of the RPi display connector. In such cases it's not an internal one. Is this just an outlier and we can ignore it? Or is there a second condition we can AND it with?
Comment Actions
Raspberry-PI usecase is slightly weird, but apart from that almost all of the mobile and ARM tablet devices uses MIPI DSI connector. So not really no, you can't make it much more specific.
Comment Actions
What I meant by raspberry-pi usecase being weird is, if you have external case for raspberry pi and connect display then it is "internal" in a way. I am not entirely sure what definition of internal we are following here.
If it is case of, is display hot-plugged? then no, DSI connector doesn't allow hotplug.
Comment Actions
I don't know either. Current definition via connector type rubs me a bit wrong but haven't looked into it yet more if there is a better criteria. Anyway let's get it merged then.