Diff Detail
- Repository
- R240 Extra CMake Modules
- Branch
- master
- Lint
No Linters Available - Unit
No Unit Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 12124 Build 12142: arc lint + arc unit
How about we test against both?
And maybe it should be using appstream-util validate instead of forcing it through flatpak?
It will make it easier to be able to run it in build.kde.org.
Aleix is correct, Flatpak commands are not possible within the CI environment (as Docker is heavily locked down, and the containerisation and other isolation measures that Flatpak tries to take are locked out as a consequence)
Not to mention that Flatpak is Linux only as well, while Appstream data isn't applicable to multiple platforms.
I have just pushed a new diff to do that.
I am not sure if it desirable to keep appstreamcli test given it fails to validate files that are validated by flathub and appstream-utils (without flathub patches).
And maybe it should be using appstream-util validate instead of forcing it through flatpak?
It will make it easier to be able to run it in build.kde.org.
I would like to also get an extra test to do that on setup where flatpak is available given that flathub uses a patched appstream-utils with relaxed validation constraints.